Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication

Objective
We evaluated the detachment force, amount of deformation, fracture mode, and pull-out force of 3 different wires used for bonded lingual retainer fabrication.

Methods
We tested 0.0215-inch five-stranded wire (PentaOne, Masel; group I), 0.016 × 0.022-inch dead-soft eight-braided wire (Bond-A-Braid, Reliance; group II), and 0.0195-inch dead-soft coaxial wire (Respond, Ormco; group III). To test detachment force, deformation, and fracture mode, we embedded 94 lower incisor teeth in acrylic blocks in pairs. Retainer wires were bonded to the teeth and vertically directed force was applied to the wire. To test pull-out force, wires were embedded in composite that was placed in a hole at the center of an acrylic block. Tensile force was applied along the long axis of the wire.

Results
Detachment force and mode of fracture were not different between groups. Deformation was significantly higher in groups II and III than in group I (p < 0.001). Mean pull-out force was significantly higher for group I compared to groups II and III (p < 0.001).

Conclusions
Detachment force and fracture mode were similar for all wires, but greater deformations were seen in dead-soft wires. Wire pull-out force was significantly higher for five-stranded coaxial wire than for the other wires tested. Five-stranded coaxial wires are suggested for use in bonded lingual retainers.

Görüntülenme
22
02.12.2021 tarihinden bu yana
İndirme
1
02.12.2021 tarihinden bu yana
Son Erişim Tarihi
20 Şubat 2024 13:06
Google Kontrol
Tıklayınız
pull-out fracture groups dead-soft coaxial significantly higher bonded applied embedded detachment deformation acrylic different five-stranded Detachment lingual tested Tensile Results between similar Deformation retainers suggested Five-stranded deformations greater Conclusions compared Objective center (PentaOne (Bond-A-Braid eight-braided
Tam Metin
Tam Metin İndirmek için tıklayın Ön izleme
Detaylı Görünüm
Eser Adı
(dc.title)
Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication
Eser Sahibi
(dc.contributor.author)
ASLI BAYSAL
Yayın Tarihi
(dc.date.issued)
2012
Diğer Yazarlar
(dc.contributor.authors)
TANCAN UYSAL
Diğer Yazarlar
(dc.contributor.authors)
NİSA GÜL
Diğer Yazarlar
(dc.contributor.authors)
MELİKE BÜŞRA ALAN
Diğer Yazarlar
(dc.contributor.authors)
SABRİ İLHAN RAMOĞLU
Yayıncı
(dc.publisher)
The Korean Association of Orthodontists
Tür
(dc.type)
Makale
Özet
(dc.description.abstract)
Objective We evaluated the detachment force, amount of deformation, fracture mode, and pull-out force of 3 different wires used for bonded lingual retainer fabrication. Methods We tested 0.0215-inch five-stranded wire (PentaOne, Masel; group I), 0.016 × 0.022-inch dead-soft eight-braided wire (Bond-A-Braid, Reliance; group II), and 0.0195-inch dead-soft coaxial wire (Respond, Ormco; group III). To test detachment force, deformation, and fracture mode, we embedded 94 lower incisor teeth in acrylic blocks in pairs. Retainer wires were bonded to the teeth and vertically directed force was applied to the wire. To test pull-out force, wires were embedded in composite that was placed in a hole at the center of an acrylic block. Tensile force was applied along the long axis of the wire. Results Detachment force and mode of fracture were not different between groups. Deformation was significantly higher in groups II and III than in group I (p < 0.001). Mean pull-out force was significantly higher for group I compared to groups II and III (p < 0.001). Conclusions Detachment force and fracture mode were similar for all wires, but greater deformations were seen in dead-soft wires. Wire pull-out force was significantly higher for five-stranded coaxial wire than for the other wires tested. Five-stranded coaxial wires are suggested for use in bonded lingual retainers.
Kayıt Giriş Tarihi
(dc.date.accessioned)
09.06.2014
Açık Erişim Tarihi
(dc.date.available)
2014-06-09
Yayın Dili
(dc.language.iso)
eng
Konu Başlıkları
(dc.subject)
Wire
Konu Başlıkları
(dc.subject)
Bonding and aligner
Atıf için Künye
(dc.identifier.citation)
Uysal, T., Gül, N., Alan, M.B., Ramoglu, S.I. (2012). Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication. Korean J Orthodontics, 42 (1), 39-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.39
ISSN
(dc.identifier.issn)
2005-372X
Yayının ilk sayfa sayısı
(dc.identifier.startpage)
39
Yayının son sayfa sayısı
(dc.identifier.endpage)
46
Dergi Sayısı
(dc.identifier.issue)
1
Dergi Cilt
(dc.identifier.volume)
42
Haklar
(dc.rights)
Open access
Tek Biçim Adres
(dc.identifier.uri)
Http://hdl.handle.net/11469/122
Analizler
Yayın Görüntülenme
Yayın Görüntülenme
Erişilen ülkeler
Erişilen şehirler
6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu kapsamında yükümlülüklerimiz ve çerez politikamız hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak için alttaki bağlantıyı kullanabilirsiniz.

creativecommons
Bu site altında yer alan tüm kaynaklar Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.
Platforms